ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of imported cases with Plasmodium ovale infections in Jiangsu Province from 2012 to 2020, so as to provide insights into the development of the imported malaria control strategy in the province. Methods All data pertaining to cases with definitive diagnosis of P. ovale malaria in Jiangsu Province from 2012 to 2020 were captured from the National Notifiable Disease Report System and the Information Management System for Parasitic Disease Control in China, including the date of going abroad and returning to China, time of malaria infections overseas, date of malaria onset, initial diagnosis and definitive diagnosis. All data pertaining to epidemic status were descriptively analyzed. Results A total of 347 cases of P. ovale malaria were reported in Jiangsu Province from 2012 to 2020, with the highest number seen in 2015 (71 cases). All cases were laboratory-confirmed overseas imported malaria cases, accounting for 14.32% of all reported malaria cases in Jiangsu Province during the period from 2012 to 2020. The 5 cities with the highest number of imported P. ovale malaria cases included Lianyungang City (53 cases, 15.27%), Nantong City (44 cases, 12.68%), Huai’an (44 cases, 12.68%), Taizhou City (44 cases, 12.68%) and Yangzhou City (36 cases, 10.37%). The highest number of imported P. ovale malaria cases was reported in October (39 cases, 11.24%), and the lowest number was seen in December (21 cases, 6.05%). P. ovale infections mainly occurred in were Equatorial Guinea (97 cases, 37.95%), Angola (60 cases, 17.29%) and Nigeria (40 cases, 11.53%). The median duration between returning to China and malaria onset was 64 (144) days, and 7.49% (26/347) of all cases developed malaria one year after returning to China. The initial diagnosis of P. ovale malaria was mainly made at county-level medical institutions (117 cases, 33.72%), and the definitive diagnosis was mainly made at city-level medical institutions (122 cases, 35.16%). The correct rate of initial diagnosis of P. ovale malaria increased from 0 in 2012 to 78.26% in 2020, appearing a tendency towards a rise year by year (χ2 = 50.90, P < 0.01). Conclusions Imported P. ovale malaria cases were reported in Jiangsu Province each year from 2012 to 2020, and P. ovale infections predominantly occurred in Africa. Initial and definitive diagnoses of P. ovale malaria were mainly made at city- and county-level medical institutions. Training on the detection ability of malaria parasites is recommended among grassroots microscopists to improve the diagnostic ability of P. ovale malaria, and consolidate the achievements of malaria elimination in Jiangsu Province.
ABSTRACT
@#Malaria and dengue are among the most important public health threats in Malaysia. These two-arthropod borne diseases have overlapping mosquito biotopes and clinical manifestations, and co-infections have been associated with increased severity notably on the haematological abnormalities. Dengue caused by four dengue virus (DENV) serotypes has been highly endemic in Malaysia. However, malaria due to Plasmodium ovale (P. ovale) has been rarely reported among Malaysian population. Nonetheless, climate change and increased influx of international travellers and migrants have shifted the parasite boundaries to non-endemic countries. Thus, diagnosis and management of imported malarial infections should rely on the geographical knowledge on the origin of potential Plasmodium species, prompt laboratory testing and public health intervention. Moreover, it would be difficult to clinically differentiate dengue fever (DF) with a potential relapse or partially treated case of P. ovale, and there is absolutely no transmission of this Plasmodium species in our country. Hence, we believed that this case deserved to be reported.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have widely been used in the diagnosis of malaria. Although the effectiveness of RDTs for malaria has previously been described in many reports, the low performance of RDTs particularly for <i>Plasmodium ovale</i> malaria in travellers have rarely been reported. Methods: This was retrospective cohort study conducted among Japanese travellers who were diagnosed with malaria at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine between January 2004 and June 2013. Diagnosis of malaria by microscopic examination, RDT, and polymerase chain reaction were performed for all the patients. The RDTs used in our study were Binax NOW Malaria (Binax Inc., Scarborough, Maine, USA) (BN) and SD Malaria Antigen Pf/Pan (Standard Diagnostics Inc., Korea) (SDMA). We compared the sensitivity of the RDTs of <i>P. ovale</i> malaria with that of <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> malaria. Results: A total of 153 cases of malaria were observed, of which 113 patients were Japanese travellers. Nine patients with <i>P. ovale</i> malaria and 17 patients with <i>P. vivax</i> malaria performing RDTs were evaluated. The overall sensitivity of RDTs for <i>P. ovale</i> malaria was 22.2% and that for <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 94.1% (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of SDMA for <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 100% and that for <i>P. ovale</i> malaria was 50%. The sensitivity of BN for <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 90.0%; however, it was unable to detect the cases of <i>P. ovale</i> malaria. Conclusions: The sensitivity of RDTs was not high enough to diagnose <i>P. ovale</i> malaria in our study. Thus, microscopic examination is indispensable not to overlook <i>P. ovale</i> malaria.
ABSTRACT
Background: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are used widely in the diagnosis of malaria. Although the effectiveness of RDTs for malaria has been described in many previous studies, the low performance of RDT particularly for <i>Plasmodium ovale</i> malaria in traveller has rarely been reported. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on Japanese travellers diagnosed with malaria at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine between January 2004 and June 2013. The diagnosis of malaria was confirmed by microscopic examination, RDT, and polymerase chain reaction in all patients. The RDTs used in our study were Binax NOW Malaria (Binax Inc., Scarborough, Maine, USA) (BN) and SD Malaria Antigen Pf/Pan (Standard Diagnostics Inc., Korea) (SDMA). We compared the sensitivity of the RDTs to <i>P. ovale</i> malaria and <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> malaria. Results: A total of 153 cases of malaria were observed, 113 of which were found among Japanese travellers. Nine patients with <i>P. ovale</i> malaria and 17 patients with <i>P. vivax</i> malaria undergoing RDTs were evaluated. The overall sensitivity of RDTs for <i>P. ovale</i> malaria and <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 22.2% and 94.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of SDMA for <i>P. ovale</i> malaria and <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 50% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of BN for <i>P. vivax</i> malaria was 90.0%, but it was ineffective in detecting the cases of <i>P. ovale</i> malaria. Conclusions: The sensitivity of RDTs was not high enough to diagnose <i>P. ovale</i> malaria in our study. In order not to overlook <i>P. ovale</i> malaria, therefore, microscopic examination is indispensable.